Yes, it would probably make more sense to split the editor and shell processes as many Python IDEs do, with IDLE running in CPython and the user's computation running in the chosen interpreter.
On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 8:35 AM, Maciej Fijalkowski <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 5:26 AM, Antoine Pitrou <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Sat, 30 Mar 2013 08:33:38 +0200 >> Simon Cross <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Having a standalone version of IDLE might be really useful to >>> alternative Python implementations. >> >> Why? > > I don't think it's worth discussing - tkinter does not work on any > other implementation than CPython and it seems it won't work. It's a > bit pity, but I guess if I felt really bad about it, I should just > make it work. > > PS. are there idle projects in SoC? Maybe we should put a more > pypy-friendly one there too? > > Cheers, > fijal > _______________________________________________ > Python-Dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev > Unsubscribe: > http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/dholth%40gmail.com _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
