Am 01.05.2013 23:48, schrieb Eli Bendersky: > Well, my point is that you currently don't have to inherit from int (or > IntEnum) > to get an __int__ method on your Enum, which is what I find questionable. > IMO > conversion to integers should only be defined for IntEnums. (But I > haven't > followed all of the discussion and this may already have been decided.) > > > Good point. I think this may be just an artifact of the implementation - PEP > 435 > prohibits implicit conversion to integers for non-IntEnum enums. Since IntEnum > came into existence, there's no real need for int-opearbility of other enums, > and their values can be arbitrary anyway.
OK, I'm stupid -- I was thinking about moving the __int__ method to IntEnum (that's why I brought it up in this part of the thread), but as a subclass of int itself that obviously isn't needed :) Georg _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
