On May 09, 2013, at 09:24 AM, Guido van Rossum wrote: >+1. This is a good one. While adding module=__name__ is actually more >typing than passing __name__ + '.Color' as the class name, the current >proposal (parsing for dots) makes it very attractive to do the wrong thing >and hardcode the module name. Then typing the module incorrectly is very >easy, and the mistake is easily overlooked because it won't be noticed >until you actually try to pickle a member.
Seems reasonable. The `module` argument should be keyword-only, and obviously namedtuple should support the same API. -Barry _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
