Le Tue, 14 May 2013 22:14:42 +1200, Ben Hoyt <benh...@gmail.com> a écrit : > >> It should be no slower when it's all moved to C. > > > > The slowdown is too small to be interesting. The main point is that > > there was no speedup, though. > > True, and thanks for testing. > > I don't think that's a big issue, however. If it's 3-8x faster in the > majority of cases (local disk on all systems, Windows networking), and > no slower in a minority (sshfs), I'm not too sad about that. > > I wonder how sshfs compared to nfs.
Ok, with a NFS mount (default options, especially "sync") to the same local VM: First run: os.walk took 17.137s, scandir.walk took 0.625s -- 27.4x as fast Second run: os.walk took 1.535s, scandir.walk took 0.617s -- 2.5x as fast (something fishy with caches?) Regards Antoine. _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
