On Thu, 30 May 2013 00:59:02 +1000, Nick Coghlan <ncogh...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 12:47 AM, Brett Cannon <br...@python.org> wrote: > > I am willing to compromise to module_to_initialize, module_to_init, or > > module_to_load. Pick one. =) > > I see this as *really* similar to a database transaction, and those > start with "session.begin()". > > Could you tolerate "with begin_module_init(name) as m:"?
But for a transaction, it is 'with session', not 'with begin_session'. With 'begin_module_init' I would have no idea what 'm' was. With Brett's 'module_to_init' I have an intuitive idea about what 'm' is. And if 'm' isn't a module, then module_manager would be better. (Note that I haven't grokked what Brett's context manager is actually doing/returning, I'm speaking here as an ignorant reader of someone else's code :) > We could even document the ability to check m.__initializing__ to see > whether this is a reload() or not. > > Cheers, > Nick. > > -- > Nick Coghlan | ncogh...@gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia > _______________________________________________ > Python-Dev mailing list > Python-Dev@python.org > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev > Unsubscribe: > http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/rdmurray%40bitdance.com _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
