On Tue, 2013-07-16 at 11:25 +1000, Steven D'Aprano wrote: > > If your code has no obvious, documented convention at all for what's internal > and what is not, they are no worse off. > > If you do have a documented convention for internal implementation details, > then you are no worse off. "I have better things to do than PEP8-ify old, > working, stable code" is a perfectly acceptable answer. "I have better things > to do than PEP9-ify old, working, stable code, but if you want to provide > regression tests and a working patch, I'll let you do so" might be an even > better one :-)
Welp, I guess I'm logically boxed in then. Thanks for showing me the errors in my thinking. Should be no problem to manage the updating of that 500K lines of public code. /scarcasm - C _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
