2013/7/7 Charles-François Natali <[email protected]>: > Well, it complicates the signature and implementation. > If we go the same way, why stop there and not expose O_DSYNC, O_SYNC, > O_DIRECT...
I added this counter-argument to the PEP. > If you want precise control over the open() sementics, os.open() is > the way to go (that's also the rationale behind io.open() opener > argument, see http://bugs.python.org/issue12105) Right. Victor _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
