On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 10:25:26PM +1000, Nick Coghlan wrote: > On 25 July 2013 20:38, Toshio Kuratomi <a.bad...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Jul 24, 2013 6:37 AM, "Brett Cannon" <br...@python.org> wrote: > >> The key, though, is adding python2 and getting your code to use that > >> binary specifically so that shifting the default name is more of a > >> convenience than something which might break existing code not ready for > >> the > >> switch. > >> > > Applicable to this, does anyone know whether distutils, setuptools, distlib, > > or any of the other standard build+install tools are doing shebang > > requiring? Are they doing the right thing wrt python vs python2? > > It occurs to me they're almost certainly using "sys.executable" to set > the shebang line, so probably not :( > > distutils-sig could probably offer a better answer though, most of the > packaging folks don't hang out here. > Thanks!
For other Linux distributors following along, here's my message to distutils-sig: http://mail.python.org/pipermail/distutils-sig/2013-July/022001.html -Toshio
pgpRDSrmks3t3.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
