On 09/06/2013 08:44 AM, R. David Murray wrote:
On Fri, 06 Sep 2013 08:14:09 -0700, Ethan Furman <et...@stoneleaf.us> wrote:
On 09/06/2013 07:47 AM, Armin Rigo wrote:
Are you suggesting that inspect.getmro(A) would return (A, object,
type)? That seems very wrong to me.
Currently, `inspect.getmro(A)` returns `(A, object)`.
Which matches A.__mro__. EOD, I think.
I hope not, because currently this leaves a hole in the introspection of class
attributes.
Is __mro__ aimed primarily at instances and not classes? That seems to be how it works. In which case, do we need
another __mmro__ (or __cmro__ or ...) to handle the mro of classes themselves?
For the short term I can restrict the change to inspect.classify_class_attrs().
--
~Ethan~
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
