On 2013-09-06, at 19:05 , Antoine Pitrou wrote: > On Fri, 06 Sep 2013 18:14:26 +0200 > Jesus Cea <j...@jcea.es> wrote: >> >>> Right now, I agree with Charles-François: your patch is too >>> intrusive. >> >> It is intrusive. Yes. I think it must be, by its own nature. Probably >> room for improvement and code transparency. But... are Python-DEVs >> interested in the project?. That is the point :) > > Well, I'm not *personally* interested in anything that only addresses > Solaris, OS X and the like :)
For what it's worth, there's also a linux port and oracle's distro has dtrace support. > And, no, it doesn't have to be *that* intrusive. Take a look at Dave > Malcolm's systemtap patch, which IIRC takes a much more sensible > approach. Is there a possibility of compatibility there, using the same placeholders for a --with-dtrace and --with-systemtap build? Jesus seems to instrument more points than Dave, but the extra points could just be defined to nothing in the systemtap implementation. _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
