Le Thu, 12 Sep 2013 07:08:47 -0700, Ethan Furman <et...@stoneleaf.us> a écrit : > On 09/11/2013 02:39 PM, Tim Delaney wrote: > > > > I would think that retrieving the keys from the dict would return > > the transformed keys (I'd call them canonical keys). > > The more I think about this the more I agree. A canonicaldict with a > key function that simply stored the transformed key and it's value > would seem to be a lot simpler:
And it wouldn't solve the use cases. What's the point? > Further, in order to store the non-canonical keys a separate list > must be kept of the keys to preseed the canonicaldict; Yeah, so this is totally silly. What you're basically saying is "we don't need TransformDict since people can re-implement it themselves". Regards Antoine. _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
