On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 4:59 PM, Steven D'Aprano <st...@pearwood.info>wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 08:42:12AM -0700, Guido van Rossum wrote: > > I'm ready to accept this PEP. Because I haven't read this entire thread > > (and 60 messages about random diversions is really too much to try and > > catch up on) I'll give people 24 hours to remind me of outstanding > > rejections. > > > > I also haven't reviewed the code in any detail, but I believe the code > > review is going well, so I'm not concerned that the PEP would have to > > revised based on that alone. > > There are a couple of outstanding issues that I am aware of, but I don't > believe that either of these affect acceptance/rejection of the PEP. > Please correct me if I am wrong. > > 1) Implementation details of the statistics.sum function. Oscar is > giving me a lot of very valuable assistance speeding up the > implementation of sum. > > 2) The current implementation has extensive docstrings, but will also > need a separate statistics.rst file. > > > I don't recall any other outstanding issues, if I have forgotten any, > please remind me. > Those certainly don't stand in the way of the PEP's acceptance (but they do block the commit of the code :-). The issues that Oscar listed also all seem resolved (though they would make a nice addition to the "Discussion" section in the PEP). -- --Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido)
_______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
