On Sep 19, 2013, at 9:50 AM, Paul Tagliamonte <paul...@debian.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 11:48:49PM +1000, Nick Coghlan wrote: >> That's OK, especially if running "pip" recommends installing "python-pip" and >> "pyvenv" and "extractpip" are also separated out so that running "pyvenv" >> recommends installing a suitable package that depends on both Python and >> "python-pip". > > Sounds sane to me! > >> We can add that to the PEP as an alternative approach for redistributors to >> take that still offers a reasonable end-user experience. > > That'd really be great, and I'm sure it'd cut off the small bit of > concern some Debian-folk have about this stuff :) This also sounds reasonable to me. Really the PEP is about reducing user friction, especially for new users, so the ideal method is to ensure it's always installed but it'd be totally OK to do what Nick suggested as that still at leasts lets pypi packages to simply document installing as ``pip install <package>`` and if it's not installed by default on Debian they'll get a good message telling them what they need to do. ----------------- Donald Stufft PGP: 0x6E3CBCE93372DCFA // 7C6B 7C5D 5E2B 6356 A926 F04F 6E3C BCE9 3372 DCFA
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
