On Sat, Sep 28, 2013 at 9:07 AM, Eli Bendersky <eli...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Sounds good. But once it's in stdlib, I think it would be proper to shift > the discussion into the normal pydev channels (python-dev, issue tracker, > etc.). Is this the plan? >
Hadn't really thought about that. I think there's a precedent for aspects of Python that have their own mailing list (e.g. import-sig). Also, python-dev is usually pretty hostile about people asking usage questions -- there's no such taboo on the Tulip list. I can certainly see how you wouldn't want to have to look at multiple trackers. Possibly the Tulip tracker could be limited to discussion of the Python 3.3 backport that I hope to maintain in that project. -- --Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido)
_______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
