CONGRATULATION! This thread reached 100 mails, it's now time to summarize it into a PEP. Is there a candidate to write it?
If no PEP is written, the thread will never die and people will continue to feed it. Victor 2013/10/11 Antoine Pitrou <solip...@pitrou.net>: > > Hello, > > On Fri, 11 Oct 2013 07:39:48 +0200 (CEST) > raymond.hettinger <python-check...@python.org> wrote: >> http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/f014b5f0773f >> changeset: 86209:f014b5f0773f >> user: Raymond Hettinger <pyt...@rcn.com> >> date: Thu Oct 10 22:39:39 2013 -0700 >> summary: >> Rename contextlib.ignored() to contextlib.ignore(). > > I don't think that this contextlib.ignore() thing has been discussed a > lot. > > Ezio was -1 on the tracker, and Eric Smith was -0. I'd like to add my > -1 too. This is a useless addition (the traditional idiom is perfectly > obvious) and makes reading foreign code more tedious by adding > superfluous API calls. > > Please consider reverting. There is absolutely zero use case for this > that wasn't already solved by the traditional "except ...: pass" idiom. > > Regards > > Antoine. > > > _______________________________________________ > Python-Dev mailing list > Python-Dev@python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev > Unsubscribe: > https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/victor.stinner%40gmail.com _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
