On Tue, 19 Nov 2013 16:06:22 -0600 Tim Peters <tim.pet...@gmail.com> wrote:
> [Antoine] > >>> Ahah, ok, I see where you're going. But how many other implementations > >>> of unpickling are there? > > [Tim] > >> That's something you should have researched when writing the PEP ;-) > >> How many implementations of Python aren't CPython? That's probably > >> the answer. I'm not an expert on that, but there's more than one. > > [Antoine] > > But "how many of them use something else than Lib/pickle.py" is the > > actual question. > > I don't know - and neither do you ;-) > > I do know that I'd like, e.g., a version of pickletools.dis() in > CPython that _did_ show the framing bits, for debugging. That's a > bare-bones "unpickler". I don't know how many other "partial > unpicklers" exist in the wild either. But their lives would also be > much easier if the framing stuff were explicit. "Mandatory > optimization" should be an oxymoron ;-) Well, I don't think it's a big deal to add a FRAME opcode if it doesn't change the current framing logic. I'd like to defer to Alexandre on this one, anyway. Regards Antoine. _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
