On 01/20/2014 11:46 AM, Brett Cannon wrote:
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 2:09 PM, Barry Warsaw wrote:
On Jan 20, 2014, at 12:05 AM, Larry Hastings wrote:
Contestant 5: "Put in __clinic__ directory, add .h"
foo.c -> __clinic__/foo.c.h
foo.h -> __clinic__/foo.h.h
This is cached output right?
Yes, it's generated entirely based on data provided
in original source file.
IOW, it can be regenerated if it's missing. If so,
this seems like a nice parallel to __pycache__.
It's mostly hidden until you want to go looking for it.
More-or-less. The key difference is you will most likely
look at the generated file *once* to copy-and-paste the
relevant macros to paste into your source file for use
(e.g. the relevant MethodDef stuff). But it's a one-time
thing that never has to be done again as long as you don't
rename a function or method.
Won't AC put those macros in the source file for you?
--
~Ethan~
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
