On 2/21/2014 3:29 PM, Greg Ewing wrote:
Antoine Pitrou wrote:
lst = [1, 2]
value = lst[2] except IndexError: "No value"
the gain in concision is counterbalanced by a loss in
readability,
This version might be more readable:
value = lst[2] except "No value" if IndexError
since it puts the normal and exceptional values next
to each other, and relegates the exception type (which
is of much less interest) to a trailing aside.
Ternary if teaches us that the normal and alternate values should be on
either end, so the present proposal corresponds to that; ternary if also
teaches us that nesting affects the right value, in the absence of
parentheses, this proposal seems to correspond, although requiring
parentheses or not is presently a topic of discussion in a different
subthread.
On the other hand, "if" and "except" are opposites in another way: "if"
is followed by an expression that, if true, means the left value is
used, and if false, means the right value is used. "Except" is followed
by an exception that, if thrown, means the right value is used, and if
not thrown, means the left value is used... but the word "except" is
opposite in meaning to "if", so this actually fits nicely with English
definitions.
Here's a challenge: There has been a big thread about None versus (SQL)
Null. Show how an except: expression can help the DB API more easily
convert from using None to using a new Null singleton, and you'll have a
winner :)
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com