On Mar 13, 2014, at 10:15 AM, Victor Stinner wrote: >It's hard to accept that a wonderful idea at a first look is not a >good idea. Some months later, I now agree and see issues of my PEPs. >The PEP process ensures that the Python "language" (+ stdlib) keeps >consistent and well designed. > >Even if a PEP is rejected, it becomes the best reference if someone >requests the same or a similar feature some months or years later. >Rejected PEPs explain almost how the Python language was designed. > >For thanks Chris, and I hope that it's not too hard for you to accept >the fact that your "inline try/except" idea is maybe not as good as >you expected :-)
Don't worry, there's always Python 4 <wink>. http://legacy.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0274/ -Barry _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
