On Mar 23, 2014, at 11:34 AM, Antoine Pitrou <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Sun, 23 Mar 2014 07:29:07 +0000 > Cory Benfield <[email protected]> wrote: >> On 23 March 2014 at 04:32:17, Terry Reedy >> ([email protected](mailto:[email protected])) wrote: >>> Instead, I think the PEP should propose a special series of server >>> enhancement releases that are based on the final 2.7 maintenance release >>> (2.7.8 or 2.7.9) but which have have a different application-specific >>> enhancement policy. >> >> This is an interesting idea. My biggest problem with it is that, at least >> with the ssl library, these aren’t server-only problems. If we suggest that >> they are, we end up in the same position we’re in right now (that is, hurting >> the internet). >> >> For example, Python 2.7’s ssl module lacks the OP_NO_COMPRESSION option for >> OpenSSL, > > This is easy to change in a bugfix release, though. Someone just has to > open an issue and write a patch. > > Regards > > Antoine. > > > _______________________________________________ > Python-Dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev > Unsubscribe: > https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/donald%40stufft.io I already did open an issue and write a patch :) There’s someone on that issue saying that flipping that without a way to flip it back would break their application. ----------------- Donald Stufft PGP: 0x6E3CBCE93372DCFA // 7C6B 7C5D 5E2B 6356 A926 F04F 6E3C BCE9 3372 DCFA
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
