On Mon, Apr 7, 2014, at 14:22, Alexander Belopolsky wrote: > On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 1:11 PM, Benjamin Peterson <benja...@python.org> > wrote: > > > > > We can populate that struct with array-specific alternatives for > > > PySequence/PyMappingMethods and eliminate the need for dynamically > > > created array types to allocate those. > > > > Why would we want to do that? > > I assume "that" means "create array types dynamically." There are many > reasons to do that in modern array implementations. See for example > ctypes. A more practical reason however is that I > believe PySequence/PyMappingMethods are cloned whenever a subclass of a > sequence/mapping type is created. For better or worse, subclassing of > numpy arrays is a popular sport these days.
I can understand why creating new array types is good fun, but how is creating a new struct helpful? _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
