On May 8, 2014, at 6:20 PM, Nick Coghlan <ncogh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On 9 May 2014 07:23, "Donald Stufft" <don...@stufft.io> wrote: > > On May 8, 2014, at 5:02 PM, Paul Moore <p.f.mo...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > Or > > > maybe we have to accept that some developers have sound reasons for > > > not hosting on PyPI and work with them to find an acceptable > > > compromise? Has anyone checked what Stefan's reasons are for not > > > hosting cdecimal on PyPI? Do they represent a use case that the PEP > > > hasn't considered? > > > > If I recall correctly his reasoning is that he finds the legal requirements > > associated with uploading to PyPI to be unsatisfactory. > > I actually need to follow up on that, because the terms *were* legally > questionable last time I looked (also too hard to review, since as far as I > am aware, they're only presented during new user sign-up). > > I'll deal with that at work today. > > > I’m pretty sure VanL wrote the terms and has explicitly said they won’t change and are exactly as broad as they need to be without being any broader[1]. They are linked to from the footer of every UI centric PyPI page. [1] https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-legal-sig/2013-March/000003.html ----------------- Donald Stufft PGP: 0x6E3CBCE93372DCFA // 7C6B 7C5D 5E2B 6356 A926 F04F 6E3C BCE9 3372 DCFA
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
