On 1 Jul 2014 11:28, "Alex Gaynor" <alex.gay...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I've come up with a new approach, which I believe is most likely to be > successful, but I'll need help to implement it. > > The idea is to find the most recent commit which is a parent of both the > ``2.7`` and ``default`` branches. Then take every single change to an ``ssl`` > related file on the ``default`` branch, and attempt to replay it on the ``2.7`` > branch. Require manual review on each commit to make sure it compiles, and to > ensure it doesn't make any backwards incompatible changes. > > I think this provides the most iterative and guided approach to getting this > done.
Sounds promising, although it may still have some challenges if the SSL code depends on earlier changes to other code. > I can do all the work of reviewing each commit, but I need some help from a > mercurial expert to automate the cherry-picking/rebasing of every single > commit. > > What do folks think? Does this approach make sense? Anyone willing to help with > the mercurial scripting? For the Mercurial part, it's probably worth posing that as a Stack Overflow question: Given two named branches in http://hg.python.org (default and 2.7) and 4 files (Python module, C module, tests, docs): - find the common ancestor - find all the commits affecting those files on default & graft them to 2.7 (with a chance to test and edit each one first) It's just a better environment for asking & answering that kind of question :) Cheers, Nick. > > Cheers, > Alex > > _______________________________________________ > Python-Dev mailing list > Python-Dev@python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev > Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/ncoghlan%40gmail.com
_______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com