On 22 Jan 2015, at 23:03, Neil Girdhar wrote:
Thanks for taking a look. I looked at inspect and I can't see
anything
that needs to change since it's the caller rather than the receiver
who has
more options after this PEP.
You are probably right. And for calling via Signature.bind() your patch
takes care of business.
Did you see anything in particular?
No, I was just using inspect.signature lately and reading the PEP
reminded me of it.
Best,
Neil
Servus,
Walter
On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 12:23 PM, Walter Dörwald
<wal...@livinglogic.de>
wrote:
On 20 Jan 2015, at 17:34, Neil Girdhar wrote:
My question first:
test_ast is mostly generated code, but I can't find where it is
being
generated. I am pretty sure I know how to fix most of the
introduced
problems. Who is generating test_ast??
Update:
So far, I've done the following:
Updated the patch to 3.5
Fixed the grammar to accept final commas in argument lists always,
and to
work with the already implemented code.
Fixed the ast to accept what it needs to accept and reject according
to
the
limitation laid down by Guido.
Fixed the parsing library.
Fixed these tests:
test_ast.py
test_extcall.py
test_grammar.py
test_syntax.py
test_unpack_ex.py
As far as I can tell, all I have left is to fix test_ast and
possibly
write
some more tests (there are already some new tests and some of the
old
negative tests expecting SyntaxError are now positive tests).
inspect.signature might need an update.
Servus,
Walter
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
