On Mon, Feb 9, 2015, at 16:32, Guido van Rossum wrote: > FWIW, I've encouraged Neil and others to complete this code as a > prerequisite for a code review (but I can't review it myself). I am > mildly > in favor of the PEP -- if the code works and looks maintainable I would > accept it. (A few things got changed in the PEP as a result of the work.)
In a way, it's a simplification, since functions are now simply called with a sequence of "generalized arguments"; there's no privileged kwarg or vararg. Of course, I wonder how much of f(**w, x, y, *k, *b, **d, c) we would see... _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
