On 13 February 2015 at 07:25, Nick Coghlan <ncogh...@gmail.com> wrote: > PEP 441 was aimed at giving the feature more visibility, in addition > to making appropriately designed archives easier to create (IIRC, my > main request for that PEP was to change the proposed module name to > the more prosaic, but also more self-explanatory, "pyzapp", although > it looks like I may have suggested that to Daniel offline rather than > through the mailing list). > > Regardless, the PEP's not controversial as far as I am aware, so it > would be nice if someone had the time to get it cleaned up and > formally proposed for 3.5 (assuming Daniel was OK with that).
I'd be willing to give that a go. The PEPs URL is giving me a "Bad Gateway" error at the moment, but I think the only coding needed in there is writing the "pyzaa/pyzapp" module. (If Steve would be willing to add the file associations - I'm not sure I want to dive into the new installer technology along with all the *other* things I'm volunteering for right now :-)) Paul _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com