On Wed, 11 Mar 2015 22:20:58 +0000
Brett Cannon <br...@python.org> wrote:
>
> You're ignoring that it's not maintained,
According to which metric/criterion?
changeset: 94932:86c9ef950288
user: Steve Dower <steve.do...@microsoft.com>
date: Tue Mar 10 09:56:38 2015 -0700
summary: Issue #23606: Disable ctypes.util.find_library("c") on
Windows so tests are skipped while we figure out how best to approach
the CRT change
changeset: 94756:7c6e3358221a
user: Serhiy Storchaka <storch...@gmail.com>
date: Thu Feb 26 15:27:57 2015 +0200
summary: Silenced minor GCC warnings.
changeset: 94653:a84ae2ccd220
user: Serhiy Storchaka <storch...@gmail.com>
date: Mon Feb 16 20:52:17 2015 +0200
summary: Issue #23450: Fixed possible integer overflows.
[etc.]
> Who knows what
> improvements, bugfixes, etc. exist upstream in libffi that we lack because
> no one wants to go through and figure it out.
Well, who knows? How about you enlighten us about that?
And why do you think cffi, which *also* requires libffi, would be
better served in that regard?
Regards
Antoine.
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
