Only if you want Java users burning all written copies of the PEP... On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 2:37 PM, Isaac Morland <ijmor...@uwaterloo.ca> wrote:
> On Mon, 20 Apr 2015, Paul Moore wrote: > > On 20 April 2015 at 19:41, Barry Warsaw <ba...@python.org> wrote: >> >>> tldr; type hints in python source are scary. Would reserving them for >>>> stub >>>> files be better? >>>> >>> >>> I think so. I think PEP 8 should require stub files for stdlib modules >>> and >>> strongly encourage them for 3rd party code. >>> >> >> Agreed. I have many of the same concerns as Harry, but I wouldn't have >> expressed them quite as well. I'm not too worried about actually >> removing annotations from the core language, but I agree that we >> should create a strong culture of "type hints go in stub files" to >> keep source files readable and clean. >> >> On that note, I'm not sure "stub" files is a particularly good name. >> Maybe "type files" would be better? Something that emphasises that >> they are the correct place to put type hints, not a workaround. >> > > How about "header" files? > > (ducks...) > > Isaac Morland CSCF Web Guru > DC 2619, x36650 WWW Software Specialist > > _______________________________________________ > Python-Dev mailing list > Python-Dev@python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev > Unsubscribe: > https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/rymg19%40gmail.com > -- Ryan [ERROR]: Your autotools build scripts are 200 lines longer than your program. Something’s wrong. http://kirbyfan64.github.io/
_______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
