Guido,

On 2015-04-29 7:52 PM, Guido van Rossum wrote:
On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 4:48 PM, Yury Selivanov <yselivanov...@gmail.com>
wrote:

Nathaniel,

On 2015-04-29 7:35 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:

What I do feel strongly about
is that whatever syntax we end up with, there should be*some*
accurate human-readable description of*what it is*. AFAICT the PEP
currently doesn't have that.

How to define human-readable description of how unary
minus operator works?

In a PEP you should probably give grammar that is not the actual grammar
from the implementation, but matches the grammar used in the reference
manual on docs.python.org.

Will do!

Thanks,
Yury
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to