Are you also going to check the code in or is someone else doing it?

On Fri, May 22, 2015, 17:47 eric.snow <python-check...@python.org> wrote:

> https://hg.python.org/peps/rev/1fbc23a1078c
> changeset:   5874:1fbc23a1078c
> user:        Eric Snow <ericsnowcurren...@gmail.com>
> date:        Fri May 22 15:45:38 2015 -0600
> summary:
>   PEP 489: The PEP is accepted.
>
> files:
>   pep-0489.txt |  11 ++++++++---
>   1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
>
> diff --git a/pep-0489.txt b/pep-0489.txt
> --- a/pep-0489.txt
> +++ b/pep-0489.txt
> @@ -7,13 +7,13 @@
>          Nick Coghlan <ncogh...@gmail.com>
>  BDFL-Delegate: Eric Snow <ericsnowcurren...@gmail.com>
>  Discussions-To: import-...@python.org
> -Status: Draft
> +Status: Final
>  Type: Standards Track
>  Content-Type: text/x-rst
>  Created: 11-Aug-2013
>  Python-Version: 3.5
> -Post-History: 23-Aug-2013, 20-Feb-2015, 16-Apr-2015
> -Resolution:
> +Post-History: 23-Aug-2013, 20-Feb-2015, 16-Apr-2015, 7-May-2015,
> 18-May-2015
> +Resolution:
> https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2015-May/140108.html
>
>
>  Abstract
> @@ -730,8 +730,13 @@
>
>  * PyModuleDef_Slot
>
> +Other changes:
> +
>  PyModuleDef.m_reload changes to PyModuleDef.m_slots.
>
> +``BuiltinImporter`` and ``ExtensionFileLoader`` will now implement
> +``create_module`` and ``exec_module``.
> +
>  The internal ``_imp`` module will have backwards incompatible changes:
>  ``create_builtin``, ``create_dynamic``, and ``exec_dynamic`` will be
> added;
>  ``init_builtin``, ``load_dynamic`` will be removed.
>
> --
> Repository URL: https://hg.python.org/peps
> _______________________________________________
> Python-checkins mailing list
> python-check...@python.org
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-checkins
>
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to