On Wed, 12 Aug 2015 01:03:38 +1000, Chris Angelico <ros...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 12:46 AM, R. David Murray <rdmur...@bitdance.com>
> wrote:
> > (If you wanted to fix an 'oops' trailing comma syntax issue, I'd vote for
> > disallowing trailing commas outside of (). The number of times I've
> > ended up with an unintentional tuple after converting a dictionary to a
> > series of assignments outnumbers both of the above :) Note, I am *not*
> > suggesting doing this!)
>
> Outside of any form of bracket, I hope you mean. The ability to leave
> a trailing comma on a list or dict is well worth keeping:
>
> func = {
> "+": operator.add,
> "-": operator.sub,
> "*": operator.mul,
> "/": operator.truediv,
> }
Sorry, "trailing comma outside ()" was a shorthand for 'trailing comma
on a complete statement'. That is, what trips me up is going from
something like:
dict(abc=1,
foo=2,
bar=3,
)
to:
abc = 1,
foo = 2,
bar = 3,
That is, I got rid of the dict(), but forgot to delete the commas.
(Real world examples are more complex and it is often that the
transformation gets done piecemeal and/or via cut and paste and I only
miss one or two of the commas...
But, for backward compatibility reasons, we wouldn't change it even if
everyone thought it was a good idea for some reason :)
--David
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
