On 28 August 2015 at 17:11, Yury Selivanov <yselivanov...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 2015-08-28 11:44 AM, Brett Cannon wrote: > >> >> Unfortunately, separating it from the standard library is something >> that I don't think we can do so late in the 3.5 release candidates >> process. >> >> >> Ultimately it's Larry's call, but I don't see why we couldn't. If we were >> talking about something as low-level as the urllib package then I would >> agree, but beyond its own tests is there anything in the stdlib that >> depends on asyncio? >> > > As Victor already replied, asyncio is pretty self contained, and > nothing in the stdlib depends on it. > > If we really can remove it, let's consider it. -1 for removing it. It is way too late for 3.5 IMHO. You should have proposed it at least 6 months ago. This feels too rushed. +1 for changing sys.path to allow pip-installed asyncio to override the stdlib version (for 3.6). Some developers complain that NodeJS's packaging system is better that Python, maybe this lack of flexibility is one of the reasons... -- Gustavo J. A. M. Carneiro Gambit Research "The universe is always one step beyond logic." -- Frank Herbert
_______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
