On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 12:17:00PM +0300, Serhiy Storchaka
<[email protected]> wrote:
> On 15.09.15 04:21, barry.warsaw wrote:
> >https://hg.python.org/peps/rev/e275c4cd4b44
> >changeset: 6059:e275c4cd4b44
> >user: Barry Warsaw <[email protected]>
> >date: Mon Sep 14 21:21:40 2015 -0400
> >summary:
> > Move 13 -> 103
> >
> >files:
> > pep-0103.rst | 2 +-
> > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> >
> >
> >diff --git a/pep-0013.rst b/pep-0103.rst
> >rename from pep-0013.rst
> >rename to pep-0103.rst
>
> Is it due to superstition?
It's because I suggested the PEP doesn't deserve to be listed among
the top Process PEPs. Mine PEP is just Informational, so a number like
103 seems to suits it better. Barry agreed.
Oleg.
--
Oleg Broytman http://phdru.name/ [email protected]
Programmers don't die, they just GOSUB without RETURN.
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
