On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 3:32 PM, Guido van Rossum <gu...@python.org> wrote:
> it is broken, due to the confusion about classic vs. timeline arithmetic > -- these have different needs but there's only one > operator. I feel silly trying to defend a design against its author. :-) Yes, a language with more than one > symbol would not have some of these problems. Similarly a language with a special symbol for string catenation would not have a non-commutative + and non-distributive *. All I am saying is that I can live with the choices made in datetime.
_______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
