From: Fabio Zadrozny <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Date: Tuesday, December 1, 2015 at 1:36 AM To: David Stewart <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Cc: "R. David Murray" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Subject: Re: [Python-Dev] Avoiding CPython performance regressions
On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 3:33 PM, Stewart, David C <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: On 11/30/15, 5:52 AM, "Python-Dev on behalf of R. David Murray" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> on behalf of [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > >There's also an Intel project posted about here recently that checks >individual benchmarks for performance regressions and posts the results >to python-checkins. The description of the project is at https://01.org/lp - Python results are indeed sent daily to python-checkins. (No results for Nov 30 and Dec 1 due to Romania National Day holiday!) There is also a graphic dashboard at http://languagesperformance.intel.com/ Hi Dave, Interesting, but I'm curious on which benchmark set are you running? From the graphs it seems it has a really high standard deviation, so, I'm curious to know if that's really due to changes in the CPython codebase / issues in the benchmark set or in how the benchmarks are run... (it doesn't seem to be the benchmarks from https://hg.python.org/benchmarks/ right?). Fabio – my advice to you is to check out the daily emails sent to python-checkins. An example is https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-checkins/2015-November/140185.html. If you still have questions, Stefan can answer (he is copied). The graphs are really just a manager-level indicator of trends, which I find very useful (I have it running continuously on one of the monitors in my office) but core developers might want to see day-to-day the effect of their changes. (Particular if they thought one was going to improve performance. It's nice to see if you get community confirmation). We do run nightly a subset of https://hg.python.org/benchmarks/ and run the full set when we are evaluating our performance patches. Some of the "benchmarks" really do have a high standard deviation, which makes them hardly very useful for measuring incremental performance improvements, IMHO. I like to see it spelled out so I can tell whether I should be worried or not about a particular delta. Dave _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
