...is that a typo for 2.7.11?
On 4/21/2016 17:44, Neil Schemenauer wrote:
I was running Python 2.4.11 under strace and I noticed some odd
looking system calls:
mmap(NULL, 262144, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0) =
0x7f9848681000
munmap(0x7f9848681000, 262144) = 0
mmap(NULL, 262144, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0) =
0x7f9848681000
munmap(0x7f9848681000, 262144) = 0
[... repeated a number of times ...]
Looking at obmalloc.c, there doesn't seem to be any high/low
watermark (hysteresis) associated with unallocating arenas. Is that
true? If so, does it seem prudent to implement something to avoid
this behavior? It seems potentially expensive if you program is
running just at the threshold of needing another arena.
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/tritium-list%40sdamon.com
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
