2016-04-24 23:16 GMT+02:00 Raymond Hettinger <raymond.hettin...@gmail.com>: >> On Apr 24, 2016, at 1:16 PM, Victor Stinner <victor.stin...@gmail.com> wrote: >> I proposed to not try to optimize ceval.c to fetch (oparg, opval) in a >> single 16-bit operation. It should be easy to implement it later, but >> I prefer to focus on changing the format of the bytecode. > > Improving instruction decoding was the whole point and it was what kicked-off > the work on the patch. It is also where most of the performance improvement > comes from and isn't the difficult part of the patch. The persnickety parts > of the patch lay elsewhere, so there is really nothing to be gained gutting > out our actual objective. > > The OPs original patch had already gotten this part done and it ran fine for > me.
Oh wait, my phrasing is unclear. I do want optimize the (opcode, oparg) fetch, I just suggested to split the patch in two parts, and first review carefully the first part. Victor _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
