> On May 27, 2016, at 5:41 PM, M.-A. Lemburg <m...@egenix.com> wrote: > > If we add this now, there should at least be an exit strategy > to remove the code again, when OpenSSL ships with the same > code, IMO.
I think it is a clear win to have the fallback implementations in cases where people either don’t have OpenSSL or don’t have a new enough OpenSSL for those implementations. Not having the fallback just makes it more difficult for people to rely on those hash functions. — Donald Stufft _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
