Awesome. That addresses my last concerns. PEP 520 is now accepted. Congratulations!
On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 1:43 PM, Eric Snow <ericsnowcurren...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 11:43 AM, Guido van Rossum <gu...@python.org> wrote: >> On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 10:30 AM, Eric Snow <ericsnowcurren...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >>> I suppose I'm having a hard time letting go of the attractiveness of >>> "read-only == complete". However, given that you've been pretty clear >>> what you think, I'm more at ease about it. :) >> >> Yeah, it's time to drop it. ;-) > > Thanks for the feedback. I've updated the PEP to resolve the open > questions. Most notably, I've dropped the read-only constraint on the > __definition_order__ attribute. Please let me know if you have any > other outstanding concerns. Otherwise I think this PEP is ready for > pronouncement. :) > > -eric -- --Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido) _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
