On 07/18/2016 02:01 PM, Jonathan Goble wrote:
This PEP isn't revisiting that original design decision, just changing the
spelling as users sometimes find the current behaviour of the binary
sequence
constructors surprising. In particular, there's a reasonable case to be made
that ``bytes(x)`` (where ``x`` is an integer) should behave like the
``bytes.byte(x)`` proposal in this PEP. Providing both behaviours as
separate
class methods avoids that ambiguity.
You have a leftover bytes.byte here.
Thanks, fixed (plus the other couple locations ;)
--
~Ethan~
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
