On 14 September 2016 at 13:18, Franklin? Lee <leewangzhong+pyt...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sep 9, 2016 1:35 AM, "Benjamin Peterson" <benja...@python.org> wrote: >> On Thu, Sep 8, 2016, at 22:33, Tim Delaney wrote: >> > Are sets also ordered by default now? None of the PEPs appear to mention >> > it. >> >> No. > > Is there anyone working to move sets in the same direction for 3.6?
It won't happen for 3.6, as we're now in feature freeze. So it'd be 3.7 at the earliest. What exactly do you mean by "in the same direction" anyway? Remember that ordering isn't guaranteed (it's an implementation detail), so are you just saying "can sets benefit from the improvements this change provided to dicts"? If you *are* hoping for ordered sets, what's your use case? (Dictionaries had particular use cases - retaining ordering of keyword arguments and class definitions, the existence of OrderedDict, ...) Paul _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
