Hi, Are there anymore suggestions how to improve the determinism of the Python 3 interpreter? As I mentioned, it seems only sets cause unreproducible bytecode. Sets have no order. But when generating the bytecode, I would expect there would still be an order since the code isn't actually executed, right?
On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 12:03 PM, INADA Naoki <songofaca...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 7:58 PM, Freddy Rietdijk > <freddyrietd...@fridh.nl> wrote: > > For Python 3.5 PYTHONHASHSEED doesn't seem to be sufficient, these items > > still seem indeterministic. > > To be sure, I ran `PYTHONHASHSEED=1 $out/bin/python -m compileall -f > $out` > > where $out is the path where I installed Python. > > > > Do you have an idea why in [3], this is Python 2.7, the timestamps are > still > > incorrect? I think they're all required for `compileall` and somehow it > > doesn't seem capable of taking into account DETERMINISTIC_BUILD. > Explicitly > > removing those pyc and pyo files and recompiling them to bytecode still > > results in timestamp issues for these 4 files. > > Sorry, I have no motivation about Python 2 anymore. >
_______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
