On Wed, 9 Aug 2017 13:36:28 +1000 Nick Coghlan <ncogh...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 8 August 2017 at 10:12, Gregory P. Smith <g...@krypto.org> wrote: > > I don't know whether it is beneficial or not - but having the capability to > > build LTO without PGO seems reasonable. I can review any pull requests > > altering configure.ac and Makefile.pre.in to make such a change. > > Being able to separate them seems useful even if it's just from the > performance research perspective of comparing "PGO only", "LTO only" > and "PGO+LTO".
That does not mean "LTO only" deserves a configure option, though. PGO is difficult to set up manually so it's fair that we provide dedicated build support for it. LTO should just be a matter of tweaking CFLAGS and LDFLAGS. Regards Antoine. _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
