On Tuesday, August 29, 2017 9:14:53 AM EDT Yury Selivanov wrote: > On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 6:53 AM, Nick Coghlan <ncogh...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On 28 August 2017 at 01:51, Jim J. Jewett <jimjjew...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> I think there is general consensus that this should go in a module > >> other than sys. (At least a submodule.) > >> > >> The specific names are still To Be Determined, but I suspect seeing > >> the functions and objects as part of a named module will affect > >> what works.> > > Given the refocusing of the PEP on the context variable API, with > > the > > other aspects introduced solely in service of making context > > variables work as defined, my current suggestion would be to make > > it a hybrid Python/C API using the "contextvars" + "_contextvars" > > naming convention. > > > > Then all most end user applications defining context variables would > > > > need is the single line: > > from contextvars import new_context_var > > I like it! > > +1 from me.
+1 _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
