On Sun, Sep 10, 2017 at 8:21 PM, Barry Warsaw <ba...@python.org> wrote:
> On Sep 9, 2017, at 15:12, Guido van Rossum <gu...@python.org> wrote: > > > > I can't tell whether this was meant seriously, but I don't think it's > worth it. People can easily write their own dummy function and give it any > damn semantics they want. Let's reject the PEP. > > Alrighty then! (Yes, it was serious, but I claim post-sprint > euphoria/delirium). > > ​Just for future reference, here's a slightly more serious comment: I think the "pass" statement wasn't mentioned yet, but clearly noop() would be duplication of functionality. So maybe the closest thing without duplication would be to make "pass" an expression which evaluates to a no-op function, but which the compiler could perhaps optimize away if it's a statement by itself, or is a builtin. -- Koos -- + Koos Zevenhoven + http://twitter.com/k7hoven +
_______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
