On Oct 4, 2017, at 05:52, Victor Stinner <victor.stin...@gmail.com> wrote:
> My problem is that almost all changes go into "Library" category. When > I read long changelogs, it's sometimes hard to identify quickly the > context (ex: impacted modules) of a change. > > It's also hard to find open bugs of a specific module on > bugs.python.org, since almost all bugs are in the very generic > "Library" category. Using full text returns "false positives". > > It's hard to find categories generic enough to not only contain a > single item, but not contain too many items neither. Other ideas: > > * XML: xml.doc, xml.etree, xml.parsers, xml.sax modules > * Import machinery: imp and importlib modules > * Typing: abc and typing modules I often run into the same problem. If we’re going to split up the Library section, then I think it makes sense to follow the top-level organization of the library manual: https://docs.python.org/3/library/index.html That already provides a mapping from module to category, and for the most part it’s a taxonomy that makes sense and is time proven. Cheers, -Barry
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
_______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
