On Oct 4, 2017, at 21:52, Nick Coghlan <ncogh...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Unfortunately we probably won’t really get a good answer in practice until >> Python 3.7 is released, so maybe I just choose one and document that the >> behavior of PYTHONBREAKPOINT under -E is provision for now. If that’s >> acceptable, then I would just treat -E for PYTHONBREAKPOINT the same as all >> other environment variables, and we’ll see how it goes. > > I'd be fine with this as the main reason I wanted PYTHONBREAKPOINT=0 > was for pre-merge CI systems, and those tend to have tightly > controlled environment settings, so you don't need to rely on -E or -I > when running your tests. > > That said, it may also be worth considering a "-X nobreakpoints" > option (and then -I could imply "-E -s -X nobreakpoints").
Thanks for the feedback Nick. For now we’ll go with the standard behavior of -E and see how it goes. We can always add a -X later. Cheers, -Barry
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
_______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
