On Tuesday, October 24, 2017 5:53:58 PM EDT Alexander Belopolsky wrote: > No, but the last time I suggested that that datetime types should > satisfy the same invariants as numbers, namely > T(repr(x)) == x, the idea was met will silence. I, on the other hand, > am not very enthusiastic about named constructors such as > date.isoparse(). Compared with date(s:str), this is one more method > name to remember, plus the potential for abuse as an instance method. > What is d.isoparse('2017-11-24')?
Agreed. datetime(s:str) seems like a far more natural and consistent choice. Elvis _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com