+1, as Guido correctly recalls, this language guarantee will work well with Jython when we get to the point of implementing 3.7+.
On Sat, Nov 4, 2017 at 12:35 PM, Guido van Rossum <gu...@python.org> wrote: > This sounds reasonable -- I think when we introduced this in 3.6 we were > worried that other implementations (e.g. Jython) would have a problem with > this, but AFAIK they've reported back that they can do this just fine. So > let's just document this as a language guarantee. > > On Sat, Nov 4, 2017 at 10:30 AM, Stefan Krah <ste...@bytereef.org> wrote: > >> >> Hello, >> >> would it be possible to guarantee that dict literals are ordered in v3.7? >> >> >> The issue is well-known and the workarounds are tedious, example: >> >> https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-ideas/2015-Decembe >> r/037423.html >> >> >> If the feature is guaranteed now, people can rely on it around v3.9. >> >> >> >> Stefan Krah >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Python-Dev mailing list >> Python-Dev@python.org >> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev >> Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/guido% >> 40python.org >> > > > > -- > --Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido) > > _______________________________________________ > Python-Dev mailing list > Python-Dev@python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev > Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/ > jbaker%40zyasoft.com > >
_______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
