On Tue, 7 Nov 2017 00:14:35 +1100 Steven D'Aprano <st...@pearwood.info> wrote: > On Mon, Nov 06, 2017 at 12:27:54PM +0100, Antoine Pitrou wrote: > > > The ordered-ness of dicts could instead become one of those stable > > CPython implementation details, such as the fact that resources are > > cleaned up timely by reference counting, that people nevertheless > > should not rely on if they're writing portable code. > > Given that (according to others) none of IronPython, Jython, Batavia, > Nuitka, or even MicroPython, should have trouble implementing an > insertion-order preserving dict, and that PyPy already has, why should > we say it is a CPython implementation detail?
That's not what I'm taking away from Paul Sokolovsky's message I was responding to. If you think otherwise then please expand and/or contact Paul so that things are made clearer one way or the other. _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
